How To Annoy People - Part The Fourth

Upon being eliminated from The Apprentice:
He says: "You're fired."
You say: "I think you'll find I'm not your employee, Sir Alan. At this stage you're no more my employer than you are mine... in fact, as that's the case, you're fired. By the way, you do know a contract of employment works, don't you?"

Yes, it's a short and puerile post today, but it's a sunny bank holiday here in London, so I'm going out on the balcony with a cup of tea. I recommend you do the same.

On A DVD Cover, No-One Can Hear You Establish Character Through Dialogue

I'll freely admit that I haven't seen this film, but I do like the way the packaging contains a clue as to the demeanour of the main character.

To crack the code, just take a look at the letters in bold in the tagline, and see the word they create...

Per Internet Ad Astra

As this picture suggests, outer space is watching us, and as Nietzsche didn't quite say, if the abyss gazes into us, shouldn't we also gaze into it ? I think so.

Anyway, in the spirit of checking our Dobsonians have their secondary mirrors aligned correctly (and other matters astronomical), I'd like to point you towards this page on NASA's website, where you can arrange to have your name - or someone else's name - put onto a microchip which will be put onto the Mars Science Laboratory rover which will be heading to Mars in 2011.

Granted, thousands of other names will be on there too, but I think it's an amusing thing anyway, and if you know a fan of matters celestial, they might like to be included. When you sign up, you can print off a free certificate, which could be a fun present for someone.

Until next time, keep watching the skies...

And I Resent Those Unskippable 'Don't Pirate Films' Warning On DVDs I Buy, It Feels Like Paying To Be Told To Do Something I'm Already Doing

I should imagine that, by now, you've heard Stephen Fry's podcast on the subject of piracy, copyright, DRM and the like. If not, it's worth a listen, as it makes some good points and raises some interesting issues which are worthy of discussion.

I point you towards it, not because I'm going to discuss any of the issues within it, but rather because I was thinking that there's one area of copyright infringement and piracy which rather tends to be overlooked in these discussions, and probably because it has next to no commercial impact; that is, items which are not commercially available. I'm mainly thinking here of things such as radio and TV shows, but it also applies to albums and films to a slightly smaller degree. I can't claim to have the most wild and esoteric tastes, but I find that certain things I'd cheerfully pay to own are no longer available, due to never being released on CD or DVD or whatever. Examples would be Victor Lewis-Smith's Radio 1 shows or the first self-titled album by Animal Logic (for some reason, Animal Logic II is available as a download, though its predecessor isn't).

So, if I want to own these things, and be able to play them whenever I want, the only real route is to see if I can find them online, and then download them there - which invariably means getting them for free and the original creators getting no money. Which, in the case of items such as the above, I'd actually be happy to pay - and as commercial releases are often of higher quality and contain extras which are missing from copies thrown onto the 'net, I'd certainly welcome the chance to do that (not to mention the conscience aspect of things).

Now, I'm painfully aware that the vast majority of music and film which you can download from t'web is commercially available - new films and CDs are often there to download within hours of release (if not before) - but I have to say that I feel slightly less bad about downloading material which isn't available in a commercial form; yes, I know it's copyright infringement in the most literal sense, but much of the argument about this topic seems to focus on the fact that doing so is taking money away from the appropriate parties, which in the case of non-commercial downloads of non-commercially available material, doesn't apply. To give an example, before there was a full release of On The Hour, a BBC radio series which was both influential and spectacularly funny, many comedy websites and discussion boards would provide links to places where you could download the series. Now that it's available to buy through the usual routes in its full form, those sites have removed those links, which seems only right and proper.

So, I think this is a bit of an overlooked area, and as one who's always keen to replace cassettes and VHS tapes wherever possible (let's face it, mp3s and DVDs just take up less space), I may simply be trying to justify questionable behaviour on my part as a means of enabling my obsessive-compulsive collecting tendencies to be satisfied. But I like to think there's something worthy of discussion here.

Incidentally, thinking about the non-availability of items which are owned or produced by the BBC led me to wonder if there isn't a commercial opportunity for a hybrid of iTunes and the BBC iPlayer whereby one can pay a sliding scale fee to access items which have been broadcast but are no longer on iPlayer; for example, 50p to download an mp3 of a radio show which is over a month old (and which isn't going to be released commercially), £1 for a TV show or documentary, with the prices increasing depending on DRM issues and whether you can download them to keep or just to stream or whatever, and upwards to the point where downloading the stuff just becomes less attractive than buying the DVD.

I appreciate that the BBC has to balance its public service and commercial thinking, but given that they sell millions of DVDs each year, I would have thought there was some way to ensure that people could get to listen to the Afternoon Play they thought sounded interesting, or see the episode of Mastermind in which someone they knew was a contestant, even if they took place outside the 'iPlayer timespan', for a fee which is small enough to be appealing to a punter but useful enough to justify the service.

Just a thought...

I Think The Staff May Have Placed Them On The Same Shelf Deliberately

Here are three DVDs I saw in Blockbuster last night:

Hero walking towards the viewer? Check.
Gun in right hand? Check.
Explosion behind him? Check.
Circle or cross-hair motif? Check.
Queen to King's Rook Four? Check.

Just Over Three Minutes, But Skewers A Number Of Films

Ah, The Onion. Often imitated, even more often embedded.

I Suspect Everyone Already Knows About This...

... but I’ve recently been having a look at Making Of, and finding it both interesting and informative.

Granted, I’ve mainly been looking at the stuff about screenwriters, but there seems to be a lot of other stuff from people who know all sorts of useful stuff about the making of films.

Have a look, why don’t you?

Feel Free To Steal The Contents Of This Post To Share With Your Friends

Journalism Examination, Paper One

Compare the following items, and then write about the concept of plagiarism, using your own words as little as possible (50 marks):

5 August 2009 - Cracked.com's article '15 more images you won't believe aren't photoshopped'

and

21 August 2009 - The Sun's article 'No computer tricks, just amazing photos'

Bonus Question: Is it clever to steal stuff that's been viewed over a million times?

Seeing Signs And Picking Up On Clues

I recently saw most of (not all of) M. Night Shyamalan's Signs again, and it set me to thinking.

Not about the film itself, really - I saw it in its entirety a few years ago, and was rather let down by the ending, with (spoiler alert) a substance that covers two-thirds of the Earth being something that galaxy-travelling aliens respond to as 'twere acid - but rather the amount of foreshadowing in the story.

To be fair, the semi-rewatch meant that I picked up on references to the aliens not liking being near water which I hadn't registered in my initial viewing, but it also made me realise just how much of the film is spent setting up elements which will pay off in the final confrontation of the film; the last words spoken by the main character's wife, the daughter's tendency to leave half-drunk glasses of water around the family home, and things like that.

I'm not knocking this at all - in fact it made me notice that the 'violent reaction to water' on the part of the aliens was less deus ex machina than I'd initially believed - as I think that foreshadowing is terrifically important in a story; as most modern writers have the luxury of being able to finish their work before handing it in (since there are now limited venues in which to publish serials Dickens-style), I think it's nice if they go back and slot in a reference or two to something that's coming later on, and which only becomes apparent as such when the revelation is made. One of my favourite examples of this is the original novel of The Shining, where Stephen King sets up the means by which Jack Torrance will die (whilst I like the photo at the end of the film version, the sudden death of Torrance struck me as almost a bit too convenient, whereas in the book it made perfect, logical sense).

As a reader or viewer, I find this both gratifying (as it flatters my intellect that yes, I spotted that reference to it earlier on), and also reassuring - there are a number of TV shows which I've stopped watching because I've had the sneaking suspicion that the creators were just making things up as they went along, and I wasn't convinced that the final destination was going to be worth the journey (most notably Lost, who lost me with the end of the first season; I'm reliably informed by people I know that it's coming together and gathering steam as it approaches its end, after some draggy, not-moving-stuff-forward bits of earlier seasons, but I'll wait until it's all done and get their final verdict on whether it's worth the trouble or not).

I think it was the writer Chekhov who stressed the importance of foreshadowing by saying that if you have a gun put on the mantelpiece in Act 1 of a play, it should be fired by the end of Act 3. I think there's a lot of truth to this, and as I say, I admire it when writers are able to set up later events in a way that they remain both inevitable and surprising.

But...

Well, the thing is, life doesn't often seem to be this neat, does it? It's fairly rare for all the random and unexplained events in our lives to suddenly become infused with meaning later on, whether it's mere hours or whole years further down the line. Whilst I'd love to claim that the arc of my life is holographic or symphonic, I think that would mean me ignoring the enormous amount of things in my life that just seem to happen.

People often say that 'everything happens for a reason', and I think that's true insofar as it means that current events are caused by previous happenings, but not that everything that happens has some ultimately enlightening or positive outcome; a man may drive his car into a bus queue because he has a heart attack at the wheel or because he's been drinking, but for the families of people killed or injured in that sort of event, the 'reason' it happened has to be ascribed to bad fortune or human folly, not to some kind of over-arching pattern to our lives, and a sense that if we just live long enough everything we've ever seen or heard or done will come together in a beautiful climax of meaning and insight which will make every second of loss or seemingly random tragedy seem worthwhile.

So from thinking that Signs was a bit lacking in foreshadowing, I actually shifted to thinking that it had gone too far the other way, making the whole of the central character's life into a run-up to the events of the film's final act. Which would be fine, except that all the events had conspired and converged, and then he was still alive at the end, and ... what? What now? His whole life had effectively been leading up to that one time and place, and now it had passed, he had to carry on living, which is a less a climax than an anti-climax (which would be the word I'd used to describe the end of the film, really - it builds really well, but doesn't seem to have a worthy ending).

On the other hand, it could well be that it's my age that's a factor here; I'm 38, and whilst I can look back on my life and think that a lot of things which seemed horrific and terrible at the time have actually nudged me along the path to where I am now, and I'm more very happy and aware of my good fortune in life, there are still an awful lot of stray and unresolved plot threads; though perhaps as I grow older they'll recede in the memory and seem so unimportant that I'll just forget about them, and find that in my old age I can really only recall the causes and effects of my life that seemed to match with its overall narrative, as if my life had been one single and seamless story.

The reason I mention age is because it does occur to me that, in quite a few of the older people I've met in my life, there's a sense of "I wouldn't worry too much" which is almost akin to that of a child (and indeed may be why children often seem to get on well with their grandparents), but not an adult. The question of whether a current problem is likely to be something that matters to us in five years' time is one which tends to put things in perspective, and it may well be that, as one approaches the age at which HM The Queen may be gearing up to send you a telegram, there's an increased sense of perspective, and that, in its way, makes everything you've seen or said or done feel like part of a cohesive story. I guess the only way for me to see if this is the case is to grow old, which means living, which was part of my plan anyway.

Besides, I thought Unbreakable was a far better film.

Now I Think About It, Plastic's Not Actually That Malleable, So Perhaps 'Rubber Man' Would Have Been More Appropriate A Name?

Pictured, the comic character Plastic Man, who you may recognise from the cartoons which used to be shown on TV.

However, despite the fact that the glasses look kind of similar, am I alone in thinking that 'Plastic Man' may not have been the original name for this fancy dress costume?

The hair doesn't match at all, and the overall look and pose makes me think it may actually have been intended to be someone else who recently died, and who was alleged to have had a fair amount of involvement with plastic in a more medical sense...

My First Attempt At Uploading Home-Made (Well, Abroad-Made, But You Know What I Mean) Video To The Blog....

... so please be gentle with me if it doesn't work.

Presented for your delectation, though, some footage of the 22 July 2009 total eclipse of the sun, which Mrs MyWife and I saw on honeymoon last month. The footage was shot in Varanasi in India, on the banks of the River Ganges, and runs for just over a minute, with totality occuring about half-way through.

If you decide to watch it, you may well want to turn the volume down a bit, as the sounds of the crowd and the like are pretty loud. And also because this stupid-sounding chap keeps on talking during it, and making asinine remarks. Honestly, some people have no sense of occasion.

I shot this, on a small hand-held digital camera, so I apologise for the shakiness and slightly dodgy picture quality, and for the way it looks a bit grainy - probably avoidable if you're some kind of expert in editing and formatting, but I'm still finding my way with this techie malarkey, so please indulge me.

Anyway, hope it's of interest, and that the reaction of the crowd gives you a flavour of the atmosphere and general sense of excitement at seeing what is, I think it's fair to say, something of a once-in-a-lifetime event.

If this embedding doesn't work, I've also uploaded the video here by way of a backup, though you'll need Windows Media Player to view it.

Beyond The Fringe

Whilst a lot of coverage of events in Scotland at this time of year focuses on the Edinburgh Fringe, it's good to see that Auntie Beeb hasn't forgotten that there are other places in Scotland.

By which I mean: the BBC Writersroom are holding a couple of their roadshow events in Scotland in September.

On Tuesday 1 September, they're at the probably-not-named-after-the-film Tron Theatre in Glasgow, on Thursday 17 September they'll be at the probably-not-named-after-the-computer Spectrum Theatre in Inverness, followed by the not-named-after-anything-I-can-think-of-to-allude-to Caird Hall in Dundee on Wednesday 14 October.

Oh, hang on, I've just realised that they're scooting down to the Norwich Playhouse on Wednesday 6 October, which rather throws off the Scottish run of events, doesn't it? Anyway, 75% Scottish is a good enough proportion to justify the overarching theme of this post, I think.

As is usual with these roadshows, folks from the Writersroom will be talking about what they look for in scripts and how they assess them, and you can save on postage costs by handing your script in to them in person, too.

Entry's free, but you do need to get your name on the list so they'll unclip the velvet rope and let you in, and you can find out how to do this (and all the other salient details) here.

I've Been Watching The West Wing A Lot Recently, And As A Result Have Delusions That I Could Be A Political Advisor

So in one line, here's how David Cameron can guarantee he becomes next Prime Minister:

Don't let Tory MPs say anything about expenses or pay, whether they think it's on the record or off the record.

In fact, if he just gags them all and concentrates on the party's key attribute of 'not being Labour', I reckon they could get in.

Mind you, Alan Duncan has a very good point when he says that being an MP or in Parliament "has been nationalised". I guess it's something to do with being - in theory anyway - a servant of the people, and having your salary paid as a result of citizens being taxed. That is still part of the job description, right?

Drive-By Posting

It's a very strange and busy day, so I won't linger long, but I wanted to share the following:

Mrs S and I are currently re-watching Prime Suspect, and it's good to see that memory hasn't amplified the programme's quality, not time diminished it; it's of a generally very high quality, and despite the length of the episodes, it's good and pacey.

What I didn't know, however, was that in 1980, Lynda la Plante, who created the show (as well as the frankly-not-good Killer Net, but let's pretend that didn't happen) appeared in Rentaghost as the character Tamara Novek.

Crikey. Definitely one for the 'I had no idea' file as far as I'm concerned.

EDITED TO ADD: Photographic evidence, to prove I'm not just making this stuff up.

He Also Provided Colours For a Comic Called Watchmen, Which You Might Have Heard Of...

I've often thought that John Higgins is a rather under-exposed comic writer and artist; not necessarily under-rated, as people who know of his work tend to admire it, but it's not as if the release of a new item from him is likely to be made at the San Diego or Chicago conventions, which is a pity, as he's a good solid artist (and a particularly skilled painter), and a friendly chap (I say this on the basis of having met John at a convention in about 1986, where my fanboy excitement meant I gabbled and talked nonsense, but he was very indulgent of my drivel).

Anyway, the first 22 pages of Razorjack, which he both wrote and drew, can now be seen for free online here - it's a PDF file, so you'll need to have appropriate PDF-reading software - and I think you'll agree it's worth a look.

And no, despite Hollywood's current fondness for adapting comics to film, it was not the source material for that Russell Mulcahy film about a killer Boar.

It's No Wonder I Feel So Old

This week, Marvel Comics have been celebrating their 70th Birthday - and good for them, I've often enjoyed their stuff, and they seem to have bounced back rather well after being declared bankrupt a few years ago.


That said, I do seem to remember an Anniversary back when I was a teenager - here's the corner box from Marvel's X-Men comic, issue 211 in 1986:

So, 1961 + 70 = 2009? Oh Marvel, I hope it's not creative accounting that has helped you claim to have a healthier bank balance...

Unintelligent Design: The Watches Worn By 007

The latest post in this occasional series is swimming against the tide a bit, but still...

There really is no need for watches to be waterproof to hundreds of metres. I'm qualified to dive, but only to 30 metres, and yet there are many watches which are water resistant to depths of 200m or more.

An example: the Omega Seamaster Planet ocean is water resistant to 600m. The deepest recorded dive using scuba equipment is 330m, just over half that. By 200m, the penetration of light from the surface is pretty much gone, so you'll need a torch to read your watch (it doesn't seem to glow in the dark or have a light, but I may have missed that). Similarly, the Rolex Submariner (dial pictured) is water-resistant to 300m, which seems a bit unnecessary.

Yes, I know there's a lot to admire about watches with the impressive build and reliability of Omega and Rolex, but this just seems excessive. I'm pretty certain there's a middle ground to be struck between making something sturdy enough to survive the general bashes and splashes of everyday life (so: a watch that doesn't scratch, and will withstand water if you go for a swim, a shower or do the washing-up) and building something to withstand events that very few people are actually likely to experience.

Then again, since many of these watches which are strangely water-resistant to the depth of the Mariana Trench are top-of-the-line models, maybe reducing the spec and reducing the price, even if it means increased sales, might work against the prestige aspect of the watches?

Hmm. Maybe it's 'intelligence' in marketing terms at the expense of design intelligence, then.

Oh, This Can't Be For Real... Can It?

One of my many sophisticated friends sent me this picture this week, I gather it's doing the rounds at the moment... surely it's not real?

I gather it originates from Holy Moly, but they're not that well known for doctored pictures, are they?

Remember That Doctor Who Episode With The Daleks Flying All Round Canary Wharf?

Canary Wharf is in Docklands in the East of London, not far from Forest Gate, where I spotted this on the pavement the other night:

I'm not forgetting about the lasers and everything, but now I've seen one in real life, I think that they're slightly less menacing. Forget firing paint onto their eyestalk, it looks as if putting a carrier bag over them might be enough to render them blind.

Then again, most people look taller on TV, don't they? The Daleks' agents must have demanded that they're only shot from the most flattering of angles.

Big Issue Poetry Competition

My li'l sis has kindly pointed out to me that Big Issue In The North are running a poetry competition.

It seems like a pretty good competition - the winner is published in the magazine, interviewed, and you get books and CDs and a certificate too. There's an entry fee, which is £2, but you can enter 7 poems for a tenner, and as all the money goes to charity anyway, I'd argue it's all rather civilised. And before you ask, no, it doesn't seem that you have to live in the North of England to enter.

I'm not sure if I'll enter - I haven't written much poetry since the inevitable teenage poems, and I'm wary of not doing anything overly purple or riddled with angst (which, if I'm honest, probably describes far too much of my poetry), but it's for a good cause, so I am thinking about it...

Anyway, let me know if you have a go (and if you win or are a runner-up or anything like that), and thanks to my wee sis for the tip!